TMI Tuesday – Hair Apparent
Well, you all can blame seton for this blog. Her post the other day (and I shan’t even link directly to it, because it is most definitely not safe for work, children, or perhaps even hi-def computer monitors. Scroll, and you’ll find it.) was certainly Too Much Something. Or maybe Just Enough of it. Anyhow, it sparked an interesting conversation about body hair.
Romance heroes’ chests seem to cover a wide spectrum, in the hair department. (Although, the cover models are nearly always waxed and oiled to a hairless sheen.) There’s the chests “sprinkled” with hair, the “dusted” with hair, the “lightly furred” – and if you read paranormals, there are the truly furred. On the other end of the spectrum, there’s Mayne, the hairless wonder – my kind of guy.
I’ll admit, when I used to just read romance, I always hated reading about the chest hair. Then when I started writing romance, I really resisted going there. I don’t know why. Eventually, I begrudgingly gave my dark-haired hero some dark chest hair to match – but I remember kind of squinting at the monitor and typing real fast, just to get it over with.
Then there are the girls – not that they have chest hair, of course. But in a historical, you’d think they’d have to have leg hair and underarm hair that curiously never gets mentioned.
And I don’t remember ever reading about anyone, male or female, with a unibrow.
What are your preferences, in life and fiction? Do you like ’em sprinkled? Dusted? Lightly furred? Would you just rather not hear about it? And aren’t you glad to live in the days of safe and inexpensive waxing treatments?
Oh, and is there anything you prefer to squint and type real fast, just to get it over with?
Don’t forget, there’s a contest going on below this post – Enter by tomorrow; you may already be a winner!